Course materials for/by Peter L. Patrick. May contain copyright material used for educational purposes. Please respect copyright.

 Descriptive Report:

Notes on InterView (IV) Report-writing

By Peter L Patrick

For LG554, Univ of Essex

 

This assignment MUST be done in conjunction with the recording of at least one sociolinguistic interview -- but it's strongly recommended that you plan to record several (3-5). In fact, it's ideal if you can plan a project which will include such interviews as one component of data collection. The assignment will consist of handing in at least one interview recording and one Descriptive IV Report. Hand it in to the office and Email me a copy, too.

The task

In this assignment you will:

·       Record one or more sociolinguistic interviews

·       Complete and hand in various related forms (see below), including ethical consent

·       Write a report describing your interview in detail, inclluding the context, the content and the language

 

Length: As with all our assignments in LG554, you should write a report of 1500 words or more. I will not penalise reports of up to 3000 words, but if you can express yourself clearly in 1500, please do. Under-length (ie, under-1500 words) reports may suffer from lack of content and be marked accordingly.

The background

We have 3 kinds of documents related to IVs in here and all 3 have different functions.

1) The physical recording (digital file, MiniDisk, cassette etc.) of an IV obviously is the primary record and source of data. It has a tremendous amount of detailed information, but it tells us nothing about the circumstances in which it was recorded, what happened immediately before or after it was turned on (and in any moments during the IV when it was turned off), and no visual information. The tape also has real names, places, and voices, and perhaps information that should be kept confidential.

2) Forms: The IV Report Form is an accurate summary of key info in the descriptive report, prompting you for descriptive details. The IVer should fill out this form as soon (and as completely) as possible after the IV is over, but not in front of the IVee. Write the real names lightly in pencil, so you don't forget them! but so you can change to pseudonyms later, if needed. (Otherwise you may have to rewrite the IV Report Form, a waste of effort.) You can download the IV Report Forms from the coursepage. Ethical permissions form: We’ll cover this in class. It is mandatory, and it will need to be signed by each person you record.

3) The Descriptive IV Report is constructed from your notes and from listening to the tapes. It should contain all relevant details of visual info, the circumstances of the IV (including how it was arranged), your impressions of the IV, a brief but detail-specific summary of topics discussed on tape with any particularly important passages referred to, perhaps quoted, and LOCATED on recording (recording number, IV number, location in minutes and seconds - see below for how to write this up).

This document tells you how to write such a report (#3)

·        Give information at the head of the report which will allow a reader to link it up with recordings and Report Forms (i.e., Recording number, IV number, date of IV, IVee and IVer identities).

·        You may report several IVs together: if, e.g., they're with the same persons, or on the same topic, or happened on the same day, it's probably a good idea.

·        Make up and use pseudonyms in your report. Use them only for people's names, names of key neighborhoods, key institutions, and perhaps streets; don't change address numbers, etc. (If you're not doing an extensive or group project, it may seem unnecessary; do it anyway, and consider it practice.)

·        Be sure to report what you said the object of the IV was: exactly what did you tell them you were doing? How did they react? Is this what you actually did? Why or why not?

·        Comment on any preliminary 'chat' (pre-IV) that occurs. What was said? How was it said? Did it differ in style from the 'interview' part that followed? Give details. Did you record it? How; or, if not, why not?

·        Attach IV Report form(s) and consent form(s) to your report.

The Point of record-keeping:

Imagine that 4 years from now you (or me, or someone else on a similar project) want to locate a narrative, or find all the speech by one person, or by a class of people that includes this person.

1.      The search begins with your (group's) Final Project Report,

2.     goes to the IV Report Forms for the listing,

3.     seeks out details on relevant-sounding ones by reading Descriptive IV Reports, and

4.     ends with the researcher happily listening to appropriate sections of recordings.

Your job in the interview is to find something worth looking for in 4 years. Your job here - in writing it up - is to make that later search easy!

How to think about report-writing:

In writing this or any other report for this class, do not think of it as simply a class document to be graded by a teacher - such an approach will not be rewarded with high marks! Think of it rather as a research document, not aimed at someone who knows you well and has heard you discuss events in class, but for another investigator coming to the files several years later. She is a stranger to you and with different purposes, needs to know quickly and precisely what you found and what was significant about it, where the facts leave off and your interpretation begins, and how to match up the various kinds of records. (This is what will be valued highly in assigning marks.)

Don't put in unnecessary verbiage, e.g. telling me that "the subject was aware of the recording process"-- of course she was! unless you were doing it secretly, and it doesn't help to be given vague info like this. On the other hand, specific quotes, gestures observed, etc. which indicate heightened awareness at a particular moment and clearly affect speech or type of answer are quite valuable and should be reported (e.g. "nervous laugh and comment on microphone at 13:45"). In general, give more detail and less 'check-listing'. By this, I mean try to avoid superficial comments like:

  • "[IVee] seemed nervous/relaxed"                       
  • "style-shifted at this point"
  • "gave several narratives"
  • "gestured a lot"
  • "never did answer"
  • "wasn't very formal, considering"

These are usually put in because you know the instructor asked you to be aware of signs of heightened awareness, but they are entirely useless to later investigators. Eliminate vague or negative descriptions; replace them with positive, carefully observed, precisely written ones. Instead, you should say things like:

·        "[IVee] chewed pen between answers"

·        "spoke faster, laughed, cheeks coloured"

·        "horse narrative at 2:20-2:40"

·        "clasped hands under chin"

·        "3-second pause, then introduced new topic"

....and so forth. Details, specifics, concrete & relevant observations, please.

In your summaries, do not just list the questions you asked, or general listings of topics (e.g., "the IV covered changes in the neighborhood" tells a reader nothing - what were they? "The IVer used the Danger-of-death and Local Politics modules" - OK, you've described the Input - now give me the Output). Give the details. I should be able to learn the basic demographic facts about the subject, for instance, without ever turning on the recording.

·        Include direct quotes wherever they are helpful or interesting. Give precise locations on recording. Note and illustrate relevant linguistic features, e.g. the variables you've chosen to study or others you happen to notice.

  • Give lots of visual description. Some people did excellent jobs with this on the deference/observation assignment - some wrote as though they have severe cataracts and short-term memory loss!
  • Use diagrams to illustrate your reports. Some of the maps/plans in the observation assignment were superb, and they are extremely helpful to a reader.

NOTE PROBLEMS and mistakes! If you did something you think is wrong or produced a bad result, say so. You will be advancing the class's research and your own progress if you do, and you will NOT be graded down for mistakes. Report as objectively as possible. Failures and mistakes are expected in here - and you are expected to acknowledge and learn from them - so please transform your embarrassment into something more useful to us all.

·        Indicate whether you are using a pseudonym: "The subject, who we decided to call Bill...". Use them! Keep pseudonym lists up-to-date; turn them in in the final report. (Once a pseudonym has been indicated, it may then go unremarked for the rest of the report.)

·        Always hand in copies (not originals!) of your IV Report Forms, so I can mark them up and return them.

Indicate when you are guessing rather than appearing to state a fact. E.g., if someone has an "Irish accent", do you know for sure they are Irish? Could it be Scots? Liverpool? (Do you know the difference?) Don't leave it out if you don't know, but don't state it as a certainty either. Don't say someone "seemed to be X's daughter" unless you can tell me WHY it seemed so (physical appearance? close use of space? intimate talk/knowledge?).

·        Give real and detailed locations of events: use real house numbers (even if pseudonymous street names), not just "2 houses down". Show them on maps. Someone equipped with your list of place-name pseudonyms should be able to find the exact spot.

Integrate your reports. Do not just give lists of things I've asked you to take note of, in separate sections. Write them up into descriptions that make sense chronologically, that have some logical scheme of organization, as a description in a novel might.

DO NOT WAIT 2-3 days to write down your notes, or make out your IV Report Forms - too much info will be lost, especially visual descriptions. Write down your notes within 24 hours of making observations.

Reports should always mention the recording quality if it is not the default (i.e. good quality). You may mention type of equipment and microphone used, mic positioning, whatever is crucial to sound. Indicate points of interest; use cases for cassettes, CDs or MiniDiscs; label tapes/discs and boxes w/numbers. (NB: With MDs, it is possible to label them digitally so that when you put them in a player you can read many details. This is fine; I do it. However it is not a substitute for labelling the outside of the disc properly. Digital info can be erased easily!) ANYthing you hand in must have your name – the class assignment – and the date on it, or I won’t accept it. If you email me recordings, please provide this info in your email.

Get your IV and Recording numbers straight before you hand in recordings.(Especially in group work: Don't hand in 3 separate forms each claiming the IV is #1, and on Tape #1!) NEVER HAND IN AN UNLABELLED FILE, TAPE OR DISC. Always hand in something with a recording number, IV number, date and place of interview, an indication of the speaker's age and identity, and the interviewer's, too.

·        A proper Recording number might be, e.g., "COL08-II-3", for the city of Colchester, the year 2008, Group II [if you are working in a group - or your initials, e.g. COL98-KS-3 for "Kana Suzuki", if it's an individual project*], and your 3rd recording. (Since we're not doing formal group work on interviews, you will be devising your own scheme for reference and adapting the one given in class to your needs. Check your handout on labelling.)

·        Select some samples of your recording, and indicate these locations in the report, so I can easily locate key things you want me to listen to.

[*Obviously in your own later work, all your recordings might be made by you, so you need not put your initials in the code! but since this is a class and I need to keep you straight, please do so.]

When referring to a specific incident, include reference to the time location, or which track of the CD/MD, etc.

·        A proper location reference might be "ESX08-3A:450", for Essex interviews in 2008, Recording #3, location 4minutes 50 seconds -- or, for MiniDisc/CD, "ESX08-3, 2/1:05" (for track 2, 1min 05 secs. along).

·        A proper IV number might be "KS-3.2", for the second interview with Kana Suzuki's third subject.

Be aware that your reports will be a resource for students that follow you here - your efforts will receive the critique of later classes. (This is what actually happens in the research community, too, so you'll be getting used to the feeling.) In later years, they'll be expected to avoid some of the mistakes you make, because they should read your reports first!

·        Old reports are available in my office, and some should be available online as samples. You may check them to see what others have done -- it's a good idea and could prove helpful. As always, don’t just copy what they’ve done – you could improve on it.

 

Principles for Initial Contacts in Interviews

Details of Assessment for LG554

LG554 Sociolinguistic Methods page

References for Lg554

Peter L. Patrick's home page

Last updated 10 October 2011